LuckySports
Landscape Designer
so, your an idiot? Nice.. Good to know
so, your an idiot? Nice.. Good to know
LS. Do you really not remember Garrett? You were active in forums then iirc. o.0
so, your an idiot? Nice.. Good to know
No you're an idiot. You continue to prove so.
Right, so people above you are apparently beneath contempt for seeking out the easiest targets for small and relatively guaranteed land? I led a rank 4 alliance, which was a 'feeder' for the top 3. I never complained once.
Right, so people above you are apparently beneath contempt for seeking out the easiest targets for small and relatively guaranteed land? I led a rank 4 alliance, which was a 'feeder' for the top 3. I never complained once.
You get your head down and defend, and attack for the losses back. It's simple. I didn't have the following to make any sort of successful up-attacking, so I stuck with defending what I had effectively. You can take a gander for yourself, that nobody complained of mass incoming from TDA a couple of rounds back - In fact, I've re-recruited many of them since because they were dedicated to rebuilding and defending despite being constantly battered from above.
I just don't get what the big fuss is - You can either accept the fact you're the most capable 'half-assed' alliance, and come hand-in-hand with being a 'feeder' alliance, or you can just sort of stop doing anything and be relatively similar to Discworld. Why all the hate for people playing the game?
/facepalm
*first ever post in forums*
My retardness is contagious
ng) in accordance with standards they were taught.
Also on topic a few points:
1)ANQ could win this round if they wished as they have played the most FTW of any alliance
snip
ng) in accordance with standards they were taught.
Also on topic a few points:
1)ANQ could win this round if they wished as they have played the most FTW of any alliance
Lol, how?
ANQ tried to play fair and 1v1. If ANQ wanted to go FTW they WOULD have teamed up whit another alliance to get more impressive results. But as ANQ does not WANT to win. ANQ wanted to have fun.
HC are the biggest SQ+FTW this round. They havent been able to properly war. Only after the 2vs1. Were they outgrew ANQ and had(still have) a massive land lead, they decided ot attack on their own. They gained land but they got killed pretty hard in defence.
HC are the biggest SQ+FTW this round.
They gained land but they got killed pretty hard in defence.
snip
there is no culture where the possessive 'your' is acceptable for 'you're = you are'
it's about being able to make your point understood. and it's (mostly) good to be back.
Lucky - you have devolved into the realm of circular arguments. You are full of the sound and the fury signifying nothing. Good luck removing your head from your ass
Right, so people above you are apparently beneath contempt for seeking out the easiest targets for small and relatively guaranteed land? I led a rank 4 alliance, which was a 'feeder' for the top 3. I never complained once.
You get your head down and defend, and attack for the losses back. It's simple. I didn't have the following to make any sort of successful up-attacking, so I stuck with defending what I had effectively. You can take a gander for yourself, that nobody complained of mass incoming from TDA a couple of rounds back - In fact, I've re-recruited many of them since because they were dedicated to rebuilding and defending despite being constantly battered from above.
I just don't get what the big fuss is - You can either accept the fact you're the most capable 'half-assed' alliance, and come hand-in-hand with being a 'feeder' alliance, or you can just sort of stop doing anything and be relatively similar to Discworld. Why all the hate for people playing the game?
/facepalm
I'm not complaining here but would like to point out a few fundamental differences between the rounds you're talking about.
This round features 3 FTW allies. 1 so called 'feeder' alliance being funky.
The round with TDA there was only 1 FTW ally and 2 try-hard alliances. Then 4-5 'feeder' alliances for the try-hards.
If you do the math that means, there was a 25% chance that TDA would be chosen for simple pick & sends by either combo or anagram. Where this round funky has a 100% chance to be targeted by pick & sends and land trains as there is no other alliances around our score to spread around the inc load.
It is rather annoying
snip
there is no culture where the possessive 'your' is acceptable for 'you're = you are'
it's about being able to make your point understood. and it's (mostly) good to be back.
Lucky - you have devolved into the realm of circular arguments. You are full of the sound and the fury signifying nothing. Good luck removing your head from your ass
A Shakespeare reference on the Bushtarion forums? You clearly don't understand the level of discourse required here anymore Garrett