Round 52 Brs

Status
Not open for further replies.

Garrett2

Landscape Designer
Joined
Jan 19, 2012
Messages
1,703
can't we all just get nekkid, smear butter over our cute little bodies and slide through the rest of the round?

Like you slid into that desert swampland? I should think not, sir.

images
 

Elevnos

BANNED
Joined
Apr 15, 2009
Messages
602
Location
England
I'm sorry Dax. But you can't say ****! You could've sent in first tick like the rest of your ally but you didn't. So don't go throwing score queen around when you clearly aren't willing to throw your own troops in to help spread the damage on your alliance....

Rebel [1,000,000]
Fanatic [16,000,000] Extremist [17,000,000]

That is without doubt the most retarded retort I've personally ever heard. Where are all these useful R/M troops that you speak of? Oh. There are none. Let's send LT staff to fight mass SA/Dogs/PoM/TL. Brilliant. You're clearly the alliance tactician.

Also worth pointing out that was 3 of us + some dogs vs what 13/14 of you? You can hardly say that's being a score queen staying for 2 ticks. We weren't going to land so recalled.

Well you stayed for two ticks, indicating you just wanted to fight a battle - You were never going to land from the get-go. And on top of that, you knew I'd make an appearance on defence. It's pretty much a certain that I will appear at every attack you send without fail.

Despite the fact you are 4x the size of our alliance, with enough seeds to put you 5.6x our size, you don't want to fight one tick vs 16m Fanatics?

Yes, that defines as SQ. Have you any other absolutely hilarious arguments for me to tear asunder?

So you want people to stay in a battle they're already losing, where they're not going to land, just to let you last tick them?
 

Martin

Garden Designer
Super Moderator
Community Operator
Joined
Dec 14, 2007
Messages
970
Location
England
I'm sorry Dax. But you can't say ****! You could've sent in first tick like the rest of your ally but you didn't. So don't go throwing score queen around when you clearly aren't willing to throw your own troops in to help spread the damage on your alliance....

Rebel [1,000,000]
Fanatic [16,000,000] Extremist [17,000,000]

That is without doubt the most retarded retort I've personally ever heard. Where are all these useful R/M troops that you speak of? Oh. There are none. Let's send LT staff to fight mass SA/Dogs/PoM/TL. Brilliant. You're clearly the alliance tactician.

Also worth pointing out that was 3 of us + some dogs vs what 13/14 of you? You can hardly say that's being a score queen staying for 2 ticks. We weren't going to land so recalled.

Well you stayed for two ticks, indicating you just wanted to fight a battle - You were never going to land from the get-go. And on top of that, you knew I'd make an appearance on defence. It's pretty much a certain that I will appear at every attack you send without fail.

Despite the fact you are 4x the size of our alliance, with enough seeds to put you 5.6x our size, you don't want to fight one tick vs 16m Fanatics?

Yes, that defines as SQ. Have you any other absolutely hilarious arguments for me to tear asunder?

So you want people to stay in a battle they're already losing, where they're not going to land, just to let you last tick them?

1. Rebels ARE ranged ;)
2. You suggest that you should never get attacked because it's obvious you'll always defend? You're the only targets of most of Eff, so you will be attacked. You're obviously scared of something which is why you're trying to bait them in to not sending "because Dax will defend!". This is also relying on your ally members to be online when necessary, and for an inactive, non-caring group that's quite a risk... so either you will slip up OR you guys care more than you let on... and we beat you, nerrrrrrr nerrrrrrrrrrr !! ;)

Scorequeening... eugh, I HATE the overuse of this term - by not staying on a BR you will lose you get labelled a scorequeen? I'm not just directing this at you Dax, but as you have prompted as response I'm going to cover all basis! Spike wants to keep his units to resend, yes he has seeds but what benefit is there to killing his units to then plant up and buy more? That's pretty retarded logic.

Can we all understand the concept of playing a game for score and troops so that enjoyment is had by keeping these troops and having BRs which are more favourable, therefore we are all scorequeens?

You got zebax to recall from me incase I countered, luckily I wasn't refreshing at the time, you lot would have then run if you didn't have enough to stop me... would that make you all scorequeens?


In summary: stop using the term scorequeen, Dax stop baiting Efficacy members with silly logic and if you'd be so kind kill all your units, you're obviously a scorequeen having kept them alive so long... ;D
 

Yeadon

Harvester
Joined
Dec 14, 2007
Messages
247
Location
West Yorkshire
I love a good old morning catch up on the verbal spouting that take place on the forums. They make my cup of tea go down a lot smoother whilst reading.

Can I just say - I enjoyed every bit of that battle. That's the kind of thing I came back for...right? ;)
 

Spiky Spoon

Head Gardener
Joined
Jul 7, 2008
Messages
271
Location
Manchester
I'm sorry Dax. But you can't say ****! You could've sent in first tick like the rest of your ally but you didn't. So don't go throwing score queen around when you clearly aren't willing to throw your own troops in to help spread the damage on your alliance....

Rebel [1,000,000]
Fanatic [16,000,000] Extremist [17,000,000]

That is without doubt the most retarded retort I've personally ever heard. Where are all these useful R/M troops that you speak of? Oh. There are none. Let's send LT staff to fight mass SA/Dogs/PoM/TL. Brilliant. You're clearly the alliance tactician.

Also worth pointing out that was 3 of us + some dogs vs what 13/14 of you? You can hardly say that's being a score queen staying for 2 ticks. We weren't going to land so recalled.

Well you stayed for two ticks, indicating you just wanted to fight a battle - You were never going to land from the get-go. And on top of that, you knew I'd make an appearance on defence. It's pretty much a certain that I will appear at every attack you send without fail.

Despite the fact you are 4x the size of our alliance, with enough seeds to put you 5.6x our size, you don't want to fight one tick vs 16m Fanatics?

Yes, that defines as SQ. Have you any other absolutely hilarious arguments for me to tear asunder?

Learn to read Dax. At no point did I say you should send in because you have useful units. I clearly said to spread the damage.......

And I wasn't even on that attack, I was just watching it from the sidelines.
 

Nickk

Harvester
Joined
Dec 14, 2007
Messages
173
Nice BR.

Ps: they stayed for 2 ticks no? What the complaints about?
 

Yeadon

Harvester
Joined
Dec 14, 2007
Messages
247
Location
West Yorkshire
No complaints from me. Like I said, I welcome such action - I would melt in to a puddle of liquidated boredom if it wasn't for 'Something' happening at least every now and again.

PS - Martin is a Score Queen......Oh no sorry, just a queen ;)
 

antisback

Head Gardener
Joined
Dec 14, 2007
Messages
429
Well you guys teased dax with dogs and sa vs fanatics and poms on close, getting dax all hard the turning away at the last second leaving dax with a stonking erection and no satisfaction, you'd be pissed off too if that happened
 
Last edited:

Dax

Hydroponics Developer
Joined
Apr 22, 2009
Messages
3,126
Location
Northants, UK
Well you guys teased dax with dogs and sa vs fanatics and poms on close, getting dax all hard the turning away at the last second leaving dax with a stonking erection and no satisfaction, you'd be pissed off too if that happened

It was only a semi as I'd only kill dogs. I'm not a bestial kinda guy - But that being said, I don't turn away anything on equal rights grounds.
 

Souls

Official Helper
Joined
Dec 14, 2007
Messages
837
I love a good old morning catch up on the verbal spouting that take place on the forums. They make my cup of tea go down a lot smoother whilst reading.

Can I just say - I enjoyed every bit of that battle. That's the kind of thing I came back for...right? ;)

Don't lie to yourself, you came back for me :evil:
 

Yeadon

Harvester
Joined
Dec 14, 2007
Messages
247
Location
West Yorkshire
You are right I did indeed, you got me.

As it is national Steak & BJ day, care to join me? I'm having the steak....
 

Dax

Hydroponics Developer
Joined
Apr 22, 2009
Messages
3,126
Location
Northants, UK
Battle Report - Defending Aftermath vs Solo
[range] 9,317,078 allied Striker attacked, killing 1,722,460 hostile staff.
[range] 31,477,746 allied Harrier attacked, killing 48,662,659 hostile staff.
[range] 19,012,526 hostile Harrier attacked, killing 26,566,640 allied staff.
[range] 21,090,788 allied Terrorist Leader attacked, killing 36,113,691 hostile staff.
[range] 13,771,005 allied Cybernetic Warrior attacked, killing 13,042,478 hostile staff.
[range] 4,705,255 allied Ranger attacked, killing 6,142,926 hostile staff.
[range] 16,354,261 hostile Ranger attacked, killing 15,548,076 allied staff.
[range] 7,637,204 allied Apache Longbow attacked, killing 13,970,235 hostile staff.
[range] 2,346,337 allied Tyrant Drone attacked, killing 2,684,080 hostile staff.

Died: 122,338,529 [£5,402,339,157,500] enemies dead. 42,114,716 [£1,993,768,740,600] friendlies dead.

About time that annoying little ******* died. Too bad Eff couldn't nail the guy taking up one of their top 20 spaces ;)
 

Amanala

Harvester
Joined
May 8, 2009
Messages
149
Location
New Zealand
Battle Report - Defending Aftermath vs Solo
[range] 9,317,078 allied Striker attacked, killing 1,722,460 hostile staff.
[range] 31,477,746 allied Harrier attacked, killing 48,662,659 hostile staff.
[range] 19,012,526 hostile Harrier attacked, killing 26,566,640 allied staff.
[range] 21,090,788 allied Terrorist Leader attacked, killing 36,113,691 hostile staff.
[range] 13,771,005 allied Cybernetic Warrior attacked, killing 13,042,478 hostile staff.
[range] 4,705,255 allied Ranger attacked, killing 6,142,926 hostile staff.
[range] 16,354,261 hostile Ranger attacked, killing 15,548,076 allied staff.
[range] 7,637,204 allied Apache Longbow attacked, killing 13,970,235 hostile staff.
[range] 2,346,337 allied Tyrant Drone attacked, killing 2,684,080 hostile staff.

Died: 122,338,529 [£5,402,339,157,500] enemies dead. 42,114,716 [£1,993,768,740,600] friendlies dead.

About time that annoying little ******* died. Too bad Eff couldn't nail the guy taking up one of their top 20 spaces ;)

Damn. What a nice BR.

The worst part was that the guy is a total Score Queen, and he didn't even stay for the middle tick.
 

Timmiejj

Pruner
Joined
Feb 13, 2013
Messages
68
[range] 90,833,271 allied SAS completely totally and utterly killed 351,694,991 hostile staff.
[range] 10,000,000 allied Harrier attacked, killing 22,662,109 hostile staff.
[range] 5,000,000 allied Cybernetic Warrior attacked, killing 24,990,943 hostile staff.
[range] 3,527,095 allied White Knight attacked, slaying 651,957 hostile staff.

Died: 400,000,000 [£4,197,800,000,000] enemies dead.

Spiky getting pwned by SAS x)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top