R46 Battle Reports

[Garrett2]

your definition of 'deserve' is quite broad and misguided. you have this zealotry against people who put in effort to win. rather, you dislike a certain group of people and rage against the machine. you are truly a rebel without a cause/clue. whichever floats your boat.

'people' are putting so much meaning into a game that is a numbers version of rock /paper /scissors. it is a game for fun and chance with *some* and *limited* skill put into choices. this continued whining about being contactable and blah blah blah is so tired.

 

[Zaheen]

your definition of 'deserve' is quite broad and misguided. you have this zealotry against people who put in effort to win. rather, you dislike a certain group of people and rage against the machine. you are truly a rebel without a cause/clue. whichever floats your boat.

'people' are putting so much meaning into a game that is a numbers version of rock /paper /scissors. it is a game for fun and chance with *some* and *limited* skill put into choices. this continued whining about being contactable and blah blah blah is so tired.

Scally have put more effort than any of you alliances put together, players who give out their number don't put any effort in at all - it's a fact, they simply don't care or want to play yet they just want to compare their pixel score with their secret society they call an alliance. I call it something else but that's besides the point here.

I have been watching Scally, they are better defenders than your crappy ex alliance was. Not sure why you are sticking up for them - just go crawl back under your bridge, troll.

 

[Garrett2]

i'm barely playing this round, so i have not watched anyone. more importantly, i don't care.

however, your opinion is not fact. in your opinion, they have put so much effort in. and nice of you to give them a shout out, but your feelings are not fact.

 

[Zaheen]

i'm barely playing this round, so i have not watched anyone. more importantly, i don't care.

however, your opinion is not fact. in your opinion, they have put so much effort in. and nice of you to give them a shout out, but your feelings are not fact.

Everything I type is fact.

But you're entitled to your 'opinion'.

 

[Garrett2]

lol. you should join LAH as ego-boy.

 

[Zaheen]

lol. you should join LAH as ego-boy.

As your replacement?

I'll pass.

 

[Dax]

lol. you should join LAH as ego-boy.

I'm insulted, we all know that's my dominion.

In other news, there was an 20-ID coverage attack immediately before that BR, but nothing of note occurred - I killed some flak, and I think a couple of people didn't recall.
We lost 3.5k land all-in-all on three ID's, but the kill damage outweighed the land loss.

 

[Dax]

I posted a relevant response to Alci, and it was deleted - Why?

My point was immediately before that failure there was a planned attack covering all 20 ID's, and it resulted in ~3.5k land loss over 3 ID's, and we caused ~2T damage to the attackers, whilst sustaining very little in return. Consider on top of that, that we are at war with Can, and it resulted in an epic win defence. (Y)

 

[Alcibiades]

I am not paying a lot of attention here this round, as per usual, but all I know is those kinds of attacks, are sheer laziness and a sure sign of a dumbass, lazy playerbase.

 

[Dax]

Well like I said, there was a well-planned effort from somebody, utilising a combination of three alliances before that utter failure of an attempt (planned by Stevey, I believe). The first was so well planned that myself and Dachi actually spent a tick discussing the incoming, more than planning defence for it.

 

[Alcibiades]

But there's no point in having a well planned attack, if you follow it up with a stupid one. Not to me anyways, and it was probably so well planned because it took days to setup (or many hours) and then they weren't ready for the second one. Which isn't to say they are crap, but it's just so funny that you follow one good attack with one bad one, which is perfectly symptomatic of your typical resistance No foresight, no continuity, just ultimately laziness.

 

[Dax]

We were looking forward to a challenging night of defence, too!

 

[Max]

Battle Report - Defending moi
[close] 199,642 allied Protestor Leader attacked, distracting 67,895 hostile staff.
[close] 42,622,575 allied Hippy attacked, distracting 37,961,008 hostile staff.
[close] 16,494,871 hostile Arsonist attacked, disabling 47,465,668 allied staff.
[close] 1,506,659 allied Political Mastermind attacked, distracting 14,027,486 hostile staff.
[close] 3,521,245 allied Protestor Guru attacked, distracting 18,643,667 hostile staff.
[close] 1,153,371 allied Hippy Van attacked, distracting 889,074 hostile staff.
[close] 592,627 allied Yob attacked, disabling 823,414 hostile staff.
[close] 37,451 allied Loudspeaker Protestor shouted in the ears of and distracted 80,622 hostile staff.
[close] 2,079,225 allied News Van attacked, distracting 34,124,247 hostile staff.

Distracted: 105,793,999 [£384,956,896,800] enemies distracted.
Disabled: 823,414 [£2,391,363,200] enemies disabled. 47,465,668 [£253,739,116,600] friendlies disabled.

You gained 114,807 effectiveness.
You gained 7.10 fame.
You gained 28.77 honour.

I thought I was in for a near-certain land loss here, but to my surprise my NVs managed to halt the thiefs!

Good thing I told the broadcasters to re-run the story of the Duchess of Cambridge's nude images, causing the enemy thiefs to get distracted trying to find them on Google image search. GO NEWS VANS!

 

[Zaheen]

New Years Day, year 2. Early hours Attacking someone [X]
Battle Report - Attacking someone [X]
[h][close] 1,000,000 hostile Protestor Leader attacked, distracting 150,578 allied staff.[/h]
[h][close] 32,289,029 hostile Hippy attacked, distracting 997,212 allied staff.[/h]
[h][m/c] 20,000,000 hostile Arsonist attacked, disabling 23,038,704 allied staff.[/h]
[h][m/c] 1,000,000 hostile Political Mastermind attacked, distracting 788,919 allied staff.[/h]
[f][middle] 3,621,641 allied Iron Golem attacked, killing 1,465,453 hostile staff.[/f]
[f][middle] 7,853,169 allied Sorcerer attacked, killing 10,993,330 hostile staff.[/f]
[f][close] 963,925 allied Cybernetic Warrior attacked, killing 496,668 hostile staff.[/f]
[h][close] 26,334,639 hostile Small Droid made some funny beeps and disabled 2,611,558 allied staff.[/h]
[h][m/c] 880,808 hostile Loudspeaker Protestor shouted in the ears of and distracted 232,765 allied staff.[/h]
[f][close] 14,938,790 allied Nanobot proved resistance was futile to 4,525,579 hostile staff.[/f]
[f][raised] 481,255 new nanobots were assimilated.[/f]
[f][close] 2,999,435 allied Tyrant Drone attacked, killing 2,854,319 hostile staff.[/f]
[f][middle] 199,988 allied Apprentice attacked, killing 122,317 hostile staff.[/f]

Distracted: [h]2,169,474 [£110,302,498,000] friendlies distracted.[/h]
Disabled: [h]25,650,262 [£293,457,609,000] friendlies disabled.[/h]
Died: [f]20,457,666 [£206,726,245,500] enemies dead.[/f]
Converted: [f]481,255 [£20,212,710,000] enemies converted.[/f]

[f]You gained 100,643 effectiveness.[/f]
[f]You gained 3.50 fame.[/f]
[f]You gained 7.24 honour.[/f]
[f]You earned £2,195,750,023 bounty.[/f]

New Years Day, year 2. Midnight Motion alarms
Motion alarms were beeping along various corridors, but we could not see anybody. Somebody is obviously trying to spy.
New Years Day, year 2. Midnight Attacking someone [X]
Battle Report - Attacking someone [X]
After what seemed like forever, we found there was no fight to be had, so we set up a few tents and decided to have a sing-song.

New Years Eve, year 1. Evening Hack detected
Our IDS alerted us of a possible hack attempt, but we couldn't trace the hackers IP in time.
New Years Eve, year 1. Evening Attacking someone [X]
Battle Report - Attacking someone [X]
[h][range] 100,001 hostile Cybernetic Warrior attacked, killing 742,694 allied staff.[/h]
[f][range] 998,828 allied Cybernetic Warrior attacked, killing 6,255,188 hostile staff.[/f]
[f][range] 3,490,088 allied Tyrant Drone attacked, killing 7,125,732 hostile staff.[/f]

Died: [h]742,694 [£4,471,489,800] friendlies dead.[/h] [f]13,380,920 [£66,779,864,000] enemies dead.[/f]

[f]You gained 93,965 effectiveness.[/f]
[f]You gained 55.65 fame.[/f]
[f]You gained 32.84 honour.[/f]
[f]You earned £3,204,678,452 bounty.[/f]
[f]You will soon be receiving £591,063,600 insurance.[/f]

_____

Flawless victory here, on the Rank 1 alliance on their biggest player LS_

I'm not one to brag, but if I don't post it here and it wipes off my news, it'll just create more drama when I mention it later and don't have 'proof'.

Here is where me and 2 solo players caught them with their pants down, the land was ours and he had to run all his CW from my Nano, not sure why really...SQ alert.

 

[Alcibiades]

Battle Report - Defending moi
[close] 199,642 allied Protestor Leader attacked, distracting 67,895 hostile staff.
[close] 42,622,575 allied Hippy attacked, distracting 37,961,008 hostile staff.
[close] 16,494,871 hostile Arsonist attacked, disabling 47,465,668 allied staff.
[close] 1,506,659 allied Political Mastermind attacked, distracting 14,027,486 hostile staff.
[close] 3,521,245 allied Protestor Guru attacked, distracting 18,643,667 hostile staff.
[close] 1,153,371 allied Hippy Van attacked, distracting 889,074 hostile staff.
[close] 592,627 allied Yob attacked, disabling 823,414 hostile staff.
[close] 37,451 allied Loudspeaker Protestor shouted in the ears of and distracted 80,622 hostile staff.
[close] 2,079,225 allied News Van attacked, distracting 34,124,247 hostile staff.

Distracted: 105,793,999 [£384,956,896,800] enemies distracted.
Disabled: 823,414 [£2,391,363,200] enemies disabled. 47,465,668 [£253,739,116,600] friendlies disabled.

You gained 114,807 effectiveness.
You gained 7.10 fame.
You gained 28.77 honour.

I thought I was in for a near-certain land loss here, but to my surprise my NVs managed to halt the thiefs!

Good thing I told the broadcasters to re-run the story of the Duchess of Cambridge's nude images, causing the enemy thiefs to get distracted trying to find them on Google image search. GO NEWS VANS!

Crazy man. Usually when newsies fire like that you're practically guaranteed a land loss. I wonder what was different. Too many geos and not enough flak? Huh. Cool shizzle. Good on you mate.

 

[Dax]

Lest he mention we were out attacking, thus why we simply blocked him...

£200b of blockers is not a victory. I've killed God knows how many this round - As has Leeroy, and others. I'm really happy you managed to kill some, and I'm more glad that it made you feel so good about how pr0 you are at Bushtarion.

The fact is, you were blocked. You killed £266b of staff, and walked away with no land.

EDIT: Agree with Alci, I was eye-opened by that Newsie number. Niiiiice.

 

[Zaheen]

Lest he mention we were out attacking, thus why we simply blocked him...

£200b of blockers is not a victory. I've killed God knows how many this round - As has Leeroy, and others. I'm really happy you managed to kill some, and I'm more glad that it made you feel so good about how pr0 you are at Bushtarion.

The fact is, you were blocked. You killed £266b of staff, and walked away with no land.

EDIT: Agree with Alci, I was eye-opened by that Newsie number. Niiiiice.

I didn't come for land, it's why I only sent like 100k Geos and pure LET, LMAO. YOU COULD HAVE BLOCKED ME WITH 500K GURU.

He had his CW home you dummy, but yes go and bum your alliance some more, we all know who owned who in that BR.

____

Sat 26th Feb, year 2. Early hours Defending Nanomnomnom [X]
Battle Report - Defending Nanomnomnom [7356]
[f][close] 1,337 allied Crazed Droid attacked, killing 6,143 hostile staff.[/f]
[f][close] 1,000,000 allied Cybernetic Warrior attacked, killing 7,319,491 hostile staff.[/f]
[f][close] 13,333,337 allied Nanobot proved resistance was futile to 22,113,737 hostile staff.[/f]
[f][raised] 2,764,430 new nanobots were assimilated.[/f]
[f][close] 2,500,000 allied Tyrant Drone attacked, killing 4,104,979 hostile staff.[/f]

Died: [f]33,544,350 [£611,663,544,800] enemies dead.[/f]
Converted: [f]2,764,430 [£116,106,060,000] enemies converted.[/f]

[f]You gained 472,080 effectiveness.[/f]
[f]You gained 5.83 fame.[/f]
[f]You gained 12.92 honour.[/f]

I think zera just quit, this is what you and your alliance do to this player base.

 

[Garrett2]

I think zera just quit, this is what you and your alliance do to this player base.

if zera quit (not a new player by any means) it's cuz he decided to slack off and his heart is not in playing. it has nothing to do with LAH... otherwise you might as well tell every rank 1 alliance since the game started that they are bad for the playerbase.

your level of crazy knows no bounds. i was told by canoodle that zera's been slacking since round start.

 

[Martin]

I think zera just quit, this is what you and your alliance do to this player base.

if zera quit (not a new player by any means) it's cuz he decided to slack off and his heart is not in playing. it has nothing to do with LAH... otherwise you might as well tell every rank 1 alliance since the game started that they are bad for the playerbase.

your level of crazy knows no bounds. i was told by canoodle that zera's been slacking since round start.

All correct, but zera has been a good player for Canoodle, beyond that 100% agreed.

 

[Zaheen]

All correct, but zera has been a good player for Canoodle, beyond that 100% agreed.

Sent by: zera Sat 06th Oct, 2012. 20:38:08 GMT Reply Forward
Subject:
I dont give up. I just dont have time to play.
so I decided to make 2 weeks. If we were winning I was going to buy troops once a day or delete.

cheers. see you next round

Sent by: zera Sat 06th Oct, 2012. 18:30:27 GMT Reply Forward
Subject:
you there?

Yes he is a good player, this is what annoys me the most really. Players giving up because you cannot play nice and have fun.

I didn't reply to his Account Mail as I thought he might just be wanting to see if I'm online or something but yeah, it was obvious by his attack he was leaving. Take care zeratul, no harsh feelings.