Flash Games

Weeble

Community Manager
Administrator
Joined
Dec 13, 2007
Messages
869
Location
UK
I got it Nopjes :p Thought it was quite amusing. I wanted to see how many people would fall for it though :p
 

BlackWolf

Landscape Designer
Joined
Dec 14, 2007
Messages
1,217
Location
Lappeenranta, Finland (Wolf territory)
Because I am not like some people are and think it is amusing to tell stupid BS jokes around as I dont ever get the fun of those as you dont actually get to laugh to anyone.

People only get irritated for no reason.

Quest of the crow is actually a game... In a way.
Yes it is that short you get it done in 2 seconds. But if you wait for credits and press play again you start to jump 2 squares at time, then 3 then 4 etc.

It is supposed to be parody of some sort... I see the only parody to be in that how stupid people are on internet and how if they get fooled by something they dont understand, they get urgent to try to fool others, like it would make them to think they are less stupid.
 

nopjes

Head Gardener
Joined
Mar 1, 2008
Messages
269
Location
Hole10, Netherlands
I guess that makes u the only one, I find it fun to joke around. even if it makes no sence as jokes that make no sence are often the funniest, anyway, if you got irritated by this, I apologize to you it was not my intend.

PS: if you really are irritated, grow up, see a therapist or start apreciating the humor of fooling someone, even if it is you who's beeing fooled. if you fell for it: Laugh! as laughing makes the world a better place.
 

BlackWolf

Landscape Designer
Joined
Dec 14, 2007
Messages
1,217
Location
Lappeenranta, Finland (Wolf territory)
Its nice game I have now played all possible games throught easily.
Its as unbalanced as all these kind of games and I hate such. Very much fun but with better balancing it could be so much better... I wonder why the heck its v1.07 already when its useless to upgarde things...

Just build long row around (huge circle covering almost whole map... start by covering smaller areas then expand later) all the minerals/mineral fields put 2-3 basic turrets to all docking points on that field. At beginning only to the side where enemy is coming, eventually when you have enought minerals to all directions.

Against motherships just deploy 2-4 missiles and done.

The key is in that with current unbalanced thing... You put 4-5 miners to each mineral, no need to upgrade. You use FREE repairing things on background and your basic turrets and missiles when sold are giving you back full money. If you upgarde you get less firepower vs funds wasted and lose money when selling. Also start with building 2nd station ASAP as when you upgrade your station it will stop producing power and you will run very low on electricity soon.

And as last thing... slow is your friend.

Heres pic...
Space%20game.JPG

_VUSED7hsXbEWn1eEw0gQw
 
Last edited:

DarkSider

Tree Surgeon
Joined
Dec 14, 2007
Messages
796
Finished with all parasites, damn addictive.
A multiplayer version would be ace.
 

CFalcon

Official Helper
Joined
Dec 14, 2007
Messages
680
Location
Kent UK
Was just thinking the same thing. The AI isn't a challenge at all, but I could imagine this getting pretty tactical against another person.
 

BlackWolf

Landscape Designer
Joined
Dec 14, 2007
Messages
1,217
Location
Lappeenranta, Finland (Wolf territory)
Addictive... not... same maps again and again, race differences = non existant... only 2 abilities = speed or strentgh... so either you try to fast expand or you just crush your enemies.

And again and again with same maps... and then same maps... and yet again those same maps... AI sucks... some races are very poor in comparison to others. agility is useless.... way too fast, way too close maps... so whats the point of making it multiplayer?

It would suck as multiplayer even more than it sucks on single. It would simply be like playing tic tac toe with some who knows to put first mark to corner.... how cool is that? One with fastest mouse and fastest units wins, well unless its map with like 6 expands and strength beats speed.

If maps would be huge and differences betweel races would be bigger, then you could make it multiplayer game. But as it is... not in this life time.
 

f0xx

Landscape Designer
Joined
Dec 18, 2007
Messages
2,195
Location
Plovdiv/Bulgaria
Well actually, I agree with BlackWolf on this one. Although the game is still quite good, it could be better.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

BlackWolf

Landscape Designer
Joined
Dec 14, 2007
Messages
1,217
Location
Lappeenranta, Finland (Wolf territory)
I dont think its even quite good. I think its like a brilliant idea turned to very sucky game... I love the idea... sometimes when I play I can almost get the feeling of tactics and fun in it... but like 99.99% of time I repeat same things and win and for some reason I dont enjoy of it.

Its like playing against comp on tic tac toe and I put my mark on corner and it doesnt put it in the middle... I lose only when I get massed by 2+ comps at my main base in row. If even then. I dont know whats really wrong with it... maybe most that its not tactical in that way it needs more fast mouse moving than tactics... if it would be really really slow or turn based game with bigger maps then it might be tactical.
 

f0xx

Landscape Designer
Joined
Dec 18, 2007
Messages
2,195
Location
Plovdiv/Bulgaria
Meh, that has to be the most stupid game on earth. I got tricked by another person in a different forum... I created 20 different brutes just to find out that EVERYTHING in the game is randomized.

The battle itself, the skills you gain, the weapons you gain... silly as hell.
 
Top