<Attempts to justify responding to obvious troll post with a diktat on a forum personality>
And lo, the continued and pointless unintelligible mutterings of a fool.
You
know that you dropped into an extremely obvious troll (you may state your understanding of it as whatever you please, the fact is I was just hoping you'd realise it for what it is and shut up). Somebody even clearly observed this for your convenience too, for the record.
My responses are limited to the subject matter presented to me: Fundamentally, this forum lacks enough of anything to justify anything
but the above "typical responses" from myself.
You clearly sit upon a self-built throne of "I r cleva", yet you don't seem to utilise what most would denominate to be intelligence. I watch you amble around every post I make, dropping yourself into attempting to argue and outwit somebody that genuinely laughs every time you respond to anything that they post - Because that is what I aim to achieve. Just because
you cannot possibly contemplate the entertainment value of this for yourself, it does not mean it does not exist: And it certainly does exist for me. And this entertainment value is infinite for those such as yourself that feel it necessary to try and demean somebody that finds your self-purpose of internet existence hilarious.
I took Philosophy to meet wonderfully vibrant individuals just as yourself, to incite and mock them for my personal amusement. Why? Because you take yourself so seriously, and in the process seem to believe that everybody else must do so, as well.
THIS BIT IS THE BIG OLD LESSON:
So please, for creation's sake take the lesson on board: Nothing you will ever say will stop me posting these supposed "predictable responses", because I enjoy seeing you (and a select few others) respond
every single time. You cannot undermine, effectively mock, or linguistically intimidate me (as I watch you also try to do to others). It's the only thing that keeps me visiting these forums, for additional information.
THIS BIT IS THE FILM-RELEVANT BIT:
Now, for your little bit about why I post about a film before a book - I happened to watch it at a friend's, as they had all decided to watch it on rental before I had appeared (
obviously from a fruitful day of trolling this goldmine of a forum), and decided that some people may take a look at it (it was an independent film, so it got a lot less media coverage than films usually do) and will be able to take away the enjoyment of it that I did. I have no desire to currently read the book, as I believe that was enough for me to chew on for the time being. Is this a crime, one might ask? Only one of being strapped for more reading time (as I clearly dictated for you above, and even linked my reading material to yourself so that you might expand your mind a tad).
AND THIS BIT IS FOR THOSE AMONGST THE FORUMS THAT SIMPLY CANNOT COMPREHEND MY BEHAVIOUR:
And there: I believe if this doesn't define to you in the simplest manner the extent of your continuing pattern of error, then you are beyond help.