flameharvester
Head Gardener
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2007
- Messages
- 437
Now I know you have read the title and gone NO!... just no..
However, I have some reasoning for my suggestion:
1) The manual is an excellent source of official information and should be retained and maintained.
2) The wiki offers an alternative, unofficial, user based, information source.
3) I personally have always gotten heavily involved in Wiki's for every game I have played, I know for myself (and based on personal experience, others) there is a great deal of enjoyment to be had in building a wiki, it offers a place to become an active member of the community in an alternative to the forums.
4) A wiki can offer many things, its not just limited to information on the game:
a) game information
b) Unit information
c) Game Tactics
d) Round stories, gives them more longevity, makes for an interesting read, etc ,etc
there are many other positive factors and the negatives are canceled out by maintaining the manual as the official resource.
Will expand on this later short on time.
However, I have some reasoning for my suggestion:
1) The manual is an excellent source of official information and should be retained and maintained.
2) The wiki offers an alternative, unofficial, user based, information source.
3) I personally have always gotten heavily involved in Wiki's for every game I have played, I know for myself (and based on personal experience, others) there is a great deal of enjoyment to be had in building a wiki, it offers a place to become an active member of the community in an alternative to the forums.
4) A wiki can offer many things, its not just limited to information on the game:
a) game information
b) Unit information
c) Game Tactics
d) Round stories, gives them more longevity, makes for an interesting read, etc ,etc
there are many other positive factors and the negatives are canceled out by maintaining the manual as the official resource.
Will expand on this later short on time.