Oh heavens forbid CG arn't as invincible.
Would you like a tissue, Dax?
I has a tiny e-penis
Dax you should really read your posts before you press sumbit *Facepalm*
No no no again you are foolish and just completely miss the point like you did on IRC yesterday where i had to explain everything to you before you finally got the point.
I'm saying your reponse to my post was just not needed.
My post was basically highlighting the fact that you shouldnt be moaning about how such an awesome unit such as CG has SOME slight hinderance against WK.
It's a fair point and saying it isnt relevant is just stupid.
But now that i've explained everything for you again, i hope you can see you just mis understood what was being said.
I <3 Twigs
I <3 Twigs
I thought you loved me.....I'm hurt! </3
No no no again you are foolish and just completely miss the point like you did on IRC yesterday where i had to explain everything to you before you finally got the point.
I'm saying your reponse to my post was just not needed.
My post was basically highlighting the fact that you shouldnt be moaning about how such an awesome unit such as CG has SOME slight hinderance against WK.
It's a fair point and saying it isnt relevant is just stupid.
But now that i've explained everything for you again, i hope you can see you just mis understood what was being said.
Alot of people don't use CG, so my saying they even rape something that Apaches only get 1:0.9 on, or 1:0.997 for PoMs is meant to highlight how strong they are.
And like I said, it wasn't a complaint; There should be a unit that can handle CG early into the round, and WK are that counter IMO - You just have to play fair to get that ability, s'all.
No no no again you are foolish and just completely miss the point like you did on IRC yesterday where i had to explain everything to you before you finally got the point.
I'm saying your reponse to my post was just not needed.
My post was basically highlighting the fact that you shouldnt be moaning about how such an awesome unit such as CG has SOME slight hinderance against WK.
It's a fair point and saying it isnt relevant is just stupid.
But now that i've explained everything for you again, i hope you can see you just mis understood what was being said.
Alot of people don't use CG, so my saying they even rape something that Apaches only get 1:0.9 on, or 1:0.997 for PoMs is meant to highlight how strong they are.
And like I said, it wasn't a complaint; There should be a unit that can handle CG early into the round, and WK are that counter IMO - You just have to play fair to get that ability, s'all.
Well maybe you should word things better next time and not act so slow?
And you say so many things are off topic... this is in the alliance forum regarding politics titled 'What's going on so far?' now if you can explain how talking about cg's is in anyway shape or form on topic of my thread please do.
To break things down for you so you actually understand please reply to my post like this:
1) You need to have worded your original post better
2) Why are you so slow? (this is a question simple answer will be sufficient)
3) How was your post about cg ontopic?
4) What gives you the right to tell someone to stay on topic are you a moderator? - I am only saying it to you to show you how moronic it is and how much of an idiot it makes you look, I don't do this to other people so yes you may consider yourself 'special' but I probably think you are special in a completely different way to you do.
Well as somebody who isn't involved with any alliance play this round I'm quite interested to see what's going on?
I see one ally pulling ahead a bit so come on people bring on the updates!
Well as somebody who isn't involved with any alliance play this round I'm quite interested to see what's going on?
I see one ally pulling ahead a bit so come on people bring on the updates!
As you can see the thread was made to discuss alliance goings on etc. Not units in the game.
But White knights? Most certainly. Or do you have to be special to interpret that?
Dax... as I requested answer the questions / reply to the points it's as simple as 1,2,3,4.
p.s. I'm pointing out how stupid / moronic you are for crying like a little girl when somebody disagrees with you by going "stay on topic!"
You aint a moderator and you clearly never will be one so please leave the rule enforcement to the bigger kids at least they have more intelligence than you.
But don't worry this is my last post responding to your stupidity, unless you actually learn to read and address the points I have brought to your very small attention.
Well as somebody who isn't involved with any alliance play this round I'm quite interested to see what's going on?
I see one ally pulling ahead a bit so come on people bring on the updates!
As you can see the thread was made to discuss alliance goings on etc. Not units in the game.
But White knights? Most certainly. Or do you have to be special to interpret that?
Dax... as I requested answer the questions / reply to the points it's as simple as 1,2,3,4.
p.s. I'm pointing out how stupid / moronic you are for crying like a little girl when somebody disagrees with you by going "stay on topic!"
You aint a moderator and you clearly never will be one so please leave the rule enforcement to the bigger kids at least they have more intelligence than you.
But don't worry this is my last post responding to your stupidity, unless you actually learn to read and address the points I have brought to your very small attention.
The subject line reads "What's going on so far".
Not "how is the alliance play so far", or "how big is Twigs ego today".
Just because you interpreted the subject as one thing does not mean that any events related to specific occurrences in the round. I would say just about anything suffices in game.