Okay, i know this will sound low, lame etc.
But i think Cyborg Gardners are overpowed.
I mean look at this.
[close] 5,000,000 allied Sentry Turret attacked, killing 5,014,839 hostile staff.
Now you all gonna say.
"But ofc, they are armor based, as they are "cyborg""
Then explain this.
[close] 500,000 allied Bunker attacked, killing 647,638 hostile staff.
Cyborg Gardener is */* defense based, at a cost of 4,200
Bunker is */***** offence based at a cost of 95,000
Sentrie is *****/* offence based at a cost of 115,000
So the cost ratio for this is.
95,000 / 4,200 = 1:22.6!
115,000 / 4,200 = 1:27.3!
and the kill ratio is 1:1?!
/Gripe
But i think Cyborg Gardners are overpowed.
I mean look at this.
[close] 5,000,000 allied Sentry Turret attacked, killing 5,014,839 hostile staff.
Now you all gonna say.
"But ofc, they are armor based, as they are "cyborg""
Then explain this.
[close] 500,000 allied Bunker attacked, killing 647,638 hostile staff.
Cyborg Gardener is */* defense based, at a cost of 4,200
Bunker is */***** offence based at a cost of 95,000
Sentrie is *****/* offence based at a cost of 115,000
So the cost ratio for this is.
95,000 / 4,200 = 1:22.6!
115,000 / 4,200 = 1:27.3!
and the kill ratio is 1:1?!
/Gripe