I declare war on LOLcats.
- Thread starter darkmane
- Start date
[range] 983,122 hostile RPG Trooper attacked, killing 76,222 allied staff.
[range] 9,452,702 allied Vampire attacked, killing 5,705,803 hostile staff.
[raised] 688,813 corpses twitched into life, becoming Lesser Vampire.
Died: 76,222 [£4,725,764,000] friendlies dead. 5,705,803 [£163,003,342,000] enemies dead.
Converted: 688,813 [£11,021,008,000] enemies converted.
You gained 73,022 effectiveness.
You earned £11,169,699,520 bounty.
You will soon be receiving £1,654,017,400 insurance.
[range] 9,452,702 allied Vampire attacked, killing 5,705,803 hostile staff.
[raised] 688,813 corpses twitched into life, becoming Lesser Vampire.
Died: 76,222 [£4,725,764,000] friendlies dead. 5,705,803 [£163,003,342,000] enemies dead.
Converted: 688,813 [£11,021,008,000] enemies converted.
You gained 73,022 effectiveness.
You earned £11,169,699,520 bounty.
You will soon be receiving £1,654,017,400 insurance.
[range] 24,224,958 allied Vampire attacked, killing 23,435,503 hostile staff.
[raised] 1,682,523 corpses twitched into life, becoming Lesser Vampire.
Died: 23,435,503 [£503,975,010,800] enemies dead.
Converted: 1,682,523 [£26,920,368,000] enemies converted.
You gained 220,029 effectiveness.
You earned £48,378,646,099 bounty.
If LOLcats want to just concede I'll stop attacking, otherwise try to put up more of a fight.... sheesh.
[raised] 1,682,523 corpses twitched into life, becoming Lesser Vampire.
Died: 23,435,503 [£503,975,010,800] enemies dead.
Converted: 1,682,523 [£26,920,368,000] enemies converted.
You gained 220,029 effectiveness.
You earned £48,378,646,099 bounty.
If LOLcats want to just concede I'll stop attacking, otherwise try to put up more of a fight.... sheesh.
[range] 2,000,000 hostile Bunker Buster attacked, killing 249,005 allied staff.
[range] 24,976,675 allied Vampire attacked, killing 51,651,350 hostile staff.
[raised] 3,217,320 corpses twitched into life, becoming Lesser Vampire.
[range] 162,693 hostile Sorcerer attacked, killing 144,690 allied staff.
Died: 393,695 [£24,409,090,000] friendlies dead. 51,651,350 [£819,436,062,000] enemies dead.
Converted: 3,217,320 [£51,477,120,000] enemies converted.
You gained 357,991 effectiveness.
You earned £131,441,037,735 bounty.
You will soon be receiving £8,543,181,500 insurance.
Fine, I'll keep going.
[range] 24,976,675 allied Vampire attacked, killing 51,651,350 hostile staff.
[raised] 3,217,320 corpses twitched into life, becoming Lesser Vampire.
[range] 162,693 hostile Sorcerer attacked, killing 144,690 allied staff.
Died: 393,695 [£24,409,090,000] friendlies dead. 51,651,350 [£819,436,062,000] enemies dead.
Converted: 3,217,320 [£51,477,120,000] enemies converted.
You gained 357,991 effectiveness.
You earned £131,441,037,735 bounty.
You will soon be receiving £8,543,181,500 insurance.
Fine, I'll keep going.
Why cant they attack him? (Am i missing something...?)
And tbh, he's doing ALOT of damage alone, with vamps (not the easiest route to do it with...)
And tbh, he's doing ALOT of damage alone, with vamps (not the easiest route to do it with...)
Alcibiades
Plant Geneticist
They could always like, y'know, defend or something? it's not like vamps don't reveal eta 3 or anything....
He has 9 land
Ahhhh! Fair play, but yeah...they could defend.
Alcibiades
Plant Geneticist
You can pull when there is too much defence
Therefore you can't really lose the fight...
Easy enough to trick someone into thinking real defence is fake and vice versa; but i do admit it makes it a little harder when you can't attack him.
in retrospect, the leader probably should've just given him the ability to write mobnotes, don't you think?
You're right, I can't be attacked. My income - because of that - is zero. I can't really suicide when I have no income, so I have to be extra cautious
They're all armor towards the top of the ranks now... or defending the HQ. I need to find some striker/RPG player to help me take down their HQ now
EDIT: Because I don't send geos (9 land) they don't HAVE to fight me. They can just plant their seeds and send away. Lots of pros and cons to having 9 land
They're all armor towards the top of the ranks now... or defending the HQ. I need to find some striker/RPG player to help me take down their HQ now
EDIT: Because I don't send geos (9 land) they don't HAVE to fight me. They can just plant their seeds and send away. Lots of pros and cons to having 9 land
f0xx
Landscape Designer
I wonder how many more people will have to abuse this so Azzer can finally fix it?
Alcibiades
Plant Geneticist
I always wondered why that existed, was it to protect 'newbies' or 'new accounts' from getting hit? If that is the case, then them not being able to dev would fix it; or simply remove the 'unable to hit under 10 acres' thing after a certain amount of time has expired for the account. After say, 2 weeks, you're either not going to play this account, or you're trying to abuse the rule and thus should be fair game.
How in the world is this abusing rules? There is no rule against it. There are many pros and many cons to having 9 acres.
If there was a rule to prevent this, I would not be able to do it or I would have been asked not to.
It takes a lot more time and/or money to do it. It takes some level of skill to do it successfully.
If there was a rule to prevent this, I would not be able to do it or I would have been asked not to.
It takes a lot more time and/or money to do it. It takes some level of skill to do it successfully.
Alcibiades
Plant Geneticist
it's not abusing rules, it's abusing a loophole in game mechanics.
We're not saying it doesn't take time/skill/money or effort to do this (although the skill/effort/time part is debatable), just that it abuses a loophole (or an exploit if you will) in the game mechanics to the detriment of the playerbase.
We're not saying it doesn't take time/skill/money or effort to do this (although the skill/effort/time part is debatable), just that it abuses a loophole (or an exploit if you will) in the game mechanics to the detriment of the playerbase.
tobapopalos
Hydroponics Developer
Edited out the bullshit.
Garrett
Landscape Designer
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2007
- Messages
- 1,872
it probably is/was a saftey valve that i've never really questioned, but then there hasn't been a need to question it.
probably saved new people from being mugged on sight... but since most everyone understands that this is about acres... i don't see anyone stealing from anyone else at such a low acre count.
in the beginning of a round, could it be devastating if someone was picking on you sure... but to even get the 100 wheels or so that would be needed would require a little bit of time at the start and i don't know anyone that starts that would stay at 5 acres.
if they've not started, then they've not filled up their acres...
i just can't conceive of a scenario that anyone would want to mill around waiting to go for an acre or 2 at round start. the income loss is minimal if it happened and surely even a full grab from wheels that if the acre steal is rounded down... then it will take 12 acres at minimum to be able to lose even 1 acre.
i'm thinking this is an old protection that isn't generally needed anymore?
probably saved new people from being mugged on sight... but since most everyone understands that this is about acres... i don't see anyone stealing from anyone else at such a low acre count.
in the beginning of a round, could it be devastating if someone was picking on you sure... but to even get the 100 wheels or so that would be needed would require a little bit of time at the start and i don't know anyone that starts that would stay at 5 acres.
if they've not started, then they've not filled up their acres...
i just can't conceive of a scenario that anyone would want to mill around waiting to go for an acre or 2 at round start. the income loss is minimal if it happened and surely even a full grab from wheels that if the acre steal is rounded down... then it will take 12 acres at minimum to be able to lose even 1 acre.
i'm thinking this is an old protection that isn't generally needed anymore?