Bot intentional triggering

willymchilybily

Landscape Designer
Joined
Dec 14, 2007
Messages
1,418
Location
uk
bot triggering....what a B*tch

bot sent on my attack and pretty much intentionally triggered as i sent 2 ticks before him. I didnt spie or check because the first tick went fine and knew i was under the AR limit, probably my own fault.

but for a bot to trigger on me; I think thats a bit harsh. They should not be able to send on a target that already has incoming. Infact they should be all round smarter. nvm. Im sure ive still got time to die again before round end.

second time this round ive seen biomechs. at least time this landed.

[r/c] 10,956,729 hostile Bio-Mechanical Warrior fired repeating pulse rifles and obliterated 22,434,984 allied staff.
[range] 2,624,969 hostile RPG Trooper attacked, killing 229,265 allied staff.
[close] 511,128 allied Iron Golem attacked, killing 54,636 hostile staff.
[close] 1,356,988 allied Dragon breathed fire on and melted 1,086,341 hostile staff.
[r/c] 115,406 hostile Shock Trooper attacked, killing 70,546 allied staff.
[r/c] 578,673 hostile Humvee attacked, killing 60,958 allied staff.
[r/c] 42 hostile White Knight attacked, slaying 110 allied staff.
[close] 9,479 allied Geo-Phys Thief stole 251 land. [0] tree. [251] bush. [0] flower. [0] grass. [0] uncultivated.

Died: 22,795,863 [£616,877,011,400] friendlies dead. 1,140,977 [£66,496,963,800] enemies dead.

You stole 251 land. [0] tree. [251] bush. [0] flower. [0] grass. [0] uncultivated.
You lost 56,489 effectiveness.
You gained 0.57 fame.
You lost 68.59 honour.
You earned £140,280,309 bounty.
You will soon be receiving £114,024,523,600 insurance.
Your max land grab was reduced in this battle.
 

Max

Garden Designer
Joined
Dec 14, 2007
Messages
1,015
Location
London
Hahaha, I've commented on this before, but mine was even more conspicuous because the bot in question RUSHED AT ETA 2 in order to trigger me hahahaha :D

They are getting smarted as many people in the forums have declared.

Bets on the number of rounds that it will take for a sentry turret bot player to win the game??? :p
 

pinpower

Landscape Designer
Super Moderator
Joined
Dec 20, 2007
Messages
2,136
Location
Bournemouth
lol, love it!

Disagree with saying they should not be able to send on a target that already has incoming, they should play as if they were a real player.
 

xvi

Harvester
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
174
Location
Idaho, USA
this is really funny actually. its like a little bot community forming and learning how to cheat :p You wonder sometimes if the puppet master isnt pulling strings behind the curtain every now and again
 

Dimitar

Landscape Designer
Joined
Dec 17, 2008
Messages
2,388
should have *


According to the rules you should use English for your posts.
 

Davs

Garden Designer
Joined
Dec 16, 2007
Messages
948
Location
England
should have *


According to the rules you should use English for your posts.

220px-Trolljegeren_poster.jpg
 

willymchilybily

Landscape Designer
Joined
Dec 14, 2007
Messages
1,418
Location
uk
Bets on the number of rounds that it will take for a sentry turret bot player to win the game??? :p
a 100 monkeys, a 100 typewriters, a hundred years.....springs to mind.

Just seen two bots hit the same target with perfect tactics.....from being so dumb they send without geos, or send over the AR limit, or stay when they trigger AR, to being so smart the second bot (ranged tick) managed to send enough flak to stop the poms from distracting the first bot (close tick), and the first bot lands.


If you were that guy you would not believe your luck. both bots decide to attack the same random target a tick apart
 
Top