back on topic all this hypothetical, this route can kill that route. is all bull....people get set int thier ways so it leads to the outcome it does.
if a striker massed grennaiders and supported with strikers and apache's (3:2:1) for example. they could kill dragons/sorc/rangers etc. instead of hitting robos and such. but this in turn would make it easier for a balanced SA polayer with alot of sa as well as enough assassins to kill the guy.
if he had equal amounts of sa/ass it would make it harder for a robo to kill him , and so may pick on thugs more.
This in turn could lead to more people massing hooligans and pb with thier tl's to try and stop the robo incoming more effectively. this could mean vamps can not mass pure vampires to be able to take on the route. as the person hasnt massed pure tl's. its because people play in a certain way it means at the top to take out those route set ups you also need to play in a certain way.
IT doesnt mean there is only one way to play though, especially if solo.
but you join an alliance the leader says your rpg mass RPG, your striker mass striker. because those are the most cost effective units at doing the job that they do. you wouldnt want a striker route massing grenaiders to take out dragons and other striker routes. because you have tl's and rpgs for that.
But dont limit yourself because of how other people play. assuming one play style is the best. you have to play a route in a certain way. think outside the box, and have fun.
the fact that some people are boring sheep that play a route in one way is what inhibits people to play in a more diverese fashion. not the routes ability to be diverse.
