Ignore thread

[Mattheus]

Above all else, I'd love to be able to ignore certain threads.

Apparently there is such a feature:
http://www.vbulletin.org/forum/showthread.php?t=127487

Only Azzer can say if it's compatible, there may be other such versions.

Please?

 

[Alcibiades]

I support this 100%

 

[Garrett]

liberate the people! empower them!

 

[f0xx]

liberate the people! empower them!

Wtf is going with this guy... you training for next presidential ellections or something?

 

[tobapopalos]

He's been reading The Motorcycle Diaries.

 

[Garrett]

not for 2 more decades kind sir. have you registered to vote yet?

 

[Souls]

What's wrong with just not clicking on the thread? :S

 

[Alcibiades]

because then it's still all up in my face, and i'd rather just be able to ignore it in it's entirety so i don't have to mark forums read; or click the thread just to make it vanish from my 'new posts' ****. I just want to be able to ignore threads so they vanish entirely from my sphere of attention.

 

[Mattheus]

What's wrong with just not clicking on the thread? :S

I admit it's a little obsessive-compulsive, but I can't stand looking at the forums with threads still marked unread after a good read through. So any threads I have no vested interest in I either have to click on just so it's marked read, or use the mark forums read feature.

Unfortunately for me the very threads that would hastily find themselves on my ignore list are those terribly annoying myspace-esque 'word association'/'3 word story' abominations that are posted in approximately a thousand times a day. You can imagine the stress that gives my OCD riddled brain.

Ofc I could just make a good ol' gripe thread about those very threads, about how they're the stupidest thing on the internet since 'WTF KOMODO'. But I decided to try and be that little more productive and find a potential solution, since some people apparently get a kick out of them. Plus I'm sure some people apart from me could find use for it.

 

[No-Dachi]

I support this.

 

[Hobbezak]

I want to bring this back up, there is still a need for this.
I need this, Azzer! :'(

 

[Mattheus]

Bump

 

[Alcibiades]

Bump

 

[tomtree]

What's wrong with just not clicking on the thread? :S

it's a bit lame being that bothered that you need to entirely ignore a thread. it's not as if their are a vast number of active threads on these forums anyway.

 

[Alcibiades]

But if such a tool exists, it's gotta be less than a 5 minute jobbie. And I know more than a few players would use such a function. I know I surely would.

Also to use your example, it's a bit lame to have to ignore someone in PM ingame, but I know it happens. That's reasonable to me, so why not extrapolate that to threads? I just don't see any valid reasons for not wanting this done.

 

[Mattheus]

What's wrong with just not clicking on the thread? :S

it's a bit lame being that bothered that you need to entirely ignore a thread. it's not as if their are a vast number of active threads on these forums anyway.

Notice how I bumped this thread on the same day the word association thread was remade ¬¬

 

[Davs]

What's wrong with just not clicking on the thread? :S

it's a bit lame being that bothered that you need to entirely ignore a thread. it's not as if their are a vast number of active threads on these forums anyway.

Notice how I bumped this thread on the same day the word association thread was remade ¬¬

Lulz

Although I also support this