f0xx
Landscape Designer
Perhaps a tick box for each separate priviledge for each member would be a better idea instead of those levels...
-
Those wishing to contribute to the game by making suggestions (both small and large) should read the following before doing so.
Bushtarion largely runs completely automatically, and has been designed intentionally to be as self-maintaining as possible, with mechanics and balance considered at a completed point.
Please do not spend large amounts of time coming up with complex suggestions in the hope that they will be read and possibly implemented in the future, unless you just enjoy the discussion, theory-craft, and such.
The most likely changes will be rules-changes, specific number-tweaks to units, techs, and similar sorts of changes, and only if a large community consensus is reached as "proof" that a change would, overall, be an improvement, and are more likely to be done in batches, occassionally, not as a regular thing.
Priviledges
- Thread starter f0xx
- Start date
TheNamelessWonder
Tree Surgeon
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2007
- Messages
- 520
Perhaps you're confusing privileges with security levels?
f0xx
Landscape Designer
It seems I am. Then what is this security level about 
tomtree
Head Gardener
It seems I am. Then what is this security level about
i think that the security level is to do with what you can do to other members. eg. you can only change titles or kick them, etc. if the have a lower security level than you.
Security levels enable you to 'rank' different players in the alliance.
For example, you can assign all of your 'officers' in your alliance a certain security level (say 150 for this example), and all the 'members' a lower security level (say, 50). Now if you want to create 'officers only' threads, just set the from and to security level when creating the thread to 150 - that way, only people with a security level of 150 can view/reply.
I'm working on getting full write ups of these kinda things into the wiki but it's taking a bit more time than I'd have hoped!
For example, you can assign all of your 'officers' in your alliance a certain security level (say 150 for this example), and all the 'members' a lower security level (say, 50). Now if you want to create 'officers only' threads, just set the from and to security level when creating the thread to 150 - that way, only people with a security level of 150 can view/reply.
I'm working on getting full write ups of these kinda things into the wiki but it's taking a bit more time than I'd have hoped!
whats the highest security level a member can be given?
hmm...time to take that extra 55!!!
hehe
hehe
f0xx
Landscape Designer
Another question. Why is there a priviledge to see incomings? Should it be default thingy?
I mean, as someone in my ally posted, next thing we will have a priviledge to be able to send defence. Just looks silly to me.
I mean, as someone in my ally posted, next thing we will have a priviledge to be able to send defence. Just looks silly to me.
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2007
- Messages
- 1,215
The incoming privelege is enabled by default, however the option is there incase somebody wants to run an "open ally", or is recruiting people he's not *totally* sure on trusting.
Basically - it's to give leaders an entirely new, and rather epic, level of customisation in how they run and manage their members & alliance. It's just an option "there if needed", that some allies may find useful for "open allies" etc. or even "temporary members", for whatever reasons.